Hikaru Sato vs Jaquelyn Ogunwale Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W L L
Form
L W W L W L L L W LHead To Head: Sato 1 - 0 Ogunwale
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sato winning 2 and Ogunwale winning 0. The last match between Sato and Ogunwale was at the W35 Roehampton, 04-08-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Hikaru Sato getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hikaru Sato | 1 |
| Jaquelyn Ogunwale | 0 |
W35 Roehampton(04-08-2024)
6
2
6
3
| Sato | Stats | Ogunwale |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 352 | Ranking | N/A |
| 335 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (107-61) | Career Total W/L | 39% (9-14) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Hikaru Sato
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:36:0 | Average Match Time | 1:36:0 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 67% (42/63) |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 57% (36/63) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hikaru Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Ruggeri
Player
Hikaru Sato
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Ivanova
Player
Hikaru Sato
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Federica Di Sarra
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Hikaru Sato
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Hikaru Sato
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Camilla Zanolini
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
79%
(
73 of
92)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Vendula Valdmannova
Player
Hikaru Sato
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Carola Cavelli
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jaquelyn Ogunwale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
Player
Amelie Brooks
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yukina Saigo
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lauryn John-Baptiste
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
Player
Anna Ozerova
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
Player
Giorgie Jones
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
Player
Andre Lukosiute
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (107/61) | Win/Loss | 39% (9/14) |
| 61% (236/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (21/34) |
| 54% (1935/1617) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (260/310) |
| 66% (94/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) |
| 45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (8/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 392 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 359 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1:32:27 | Average Match Time | 1:34:46 |
| 385.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 494.57 |
| 60% (5510/9201) | 1st Serve % | 64% (896/1395) |
| 65% (3568/5510) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (489/896) |
| 47% (1722/3691) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (206/499) |
| 47% (527/1133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (74/145) |
| 45% (4187/9306) | Return Points Win % | 45% (615/1365) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (68/46) | Challenger W/L | 39% (9/14) |
| 72% (39/15) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (107/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (19/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 59% (32/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (6/9) |
| 91% (95/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
| 9% (95/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
| 29% (73/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (17/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
